War has a financial map as well as a map of the front lines. And wherever trench lines run, balance-sheet lines run too. Behind...
The 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation and its 2020 “amendments” are not a Fundamental Law, but the charter of a private trading company...
The Birth Certificate: Where the Conveyor Belt Begins
Decrees No. SUR 032 and No. Д/Н 043 of the USSR State Committee for the State of...
Treaties signed by states are usually regarded as unshakeable. But what if a document bearing signatures and seals had no force from the outset?...
The Price of Choice: How an Offer Conceals Forgone Gains
Any system based on offers rests on one fundamental deception: it offers a choice but...
STRASBOURG QUESTIONED THE STATE DUMA’S RIGHT TO REPRESENT THE PEOPLE The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe challenged the legitimacy of the newly constituted State Duma and called for restrictions on engagement with it. Resolution No. 2677 (2026), adopted on 30 September, also calls for sanctions against the Russian Federation’s Central Election Commission and other listed participants in electoral processes. The document gives renewed relevance to statements by the USSR State Committee for the State of Emergency (GKChP) published as early as 2024. At the heart of the resolution are the foundations of representative pow…
The USSR Civil Defence Academy compares SK-42 and SK-63, the conditions for using existing geodetic materials, cadastral procedures and territorial classification systems. It separately examines maritime-baseline acts and restrictions on land ownership in border territories, presenting the lecture’s position on RF status and the Soviet legal framework for territory.
An examination of the Academy’s position on Russian classification systems, cadastral procedures and Soviet SAAT. Geodetic systems, the classification of territorial units and acts concerning maritime baselines are treated as distinct subjects within the lecture. The dates, references and Soviet codes cited in the source are preserved.
The Academy examines Decree No. 521 of 27 July 2026 on restrictions on land ownership by foreign citizens, stateless persons and foreign legal entities in listed border territories. It treats USSR citizens as foreigners for the Russian system and challenges the basis of the list through its assessment of RF borders and comparison with SAAT.
The Academy’s position on canon law, UNIDROIT, the Venice Commission and the distinction between the human being and the persona. The USSR’s role as an obstacle to the described system is preserved; claimed annulment of records, trust closure dates and the audit’s move to settlements are distinguished.








































